Friday, July 20, 2012

Empedocles and Anaxagoras


A Protocol Paper in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy

Anaxagoras

Empedocles


What is change? Change, according to Webster’s Universal Dictionary and Thesaurus, is to make different, to alter, to transform or to modify. Changes exist everywhere. Even in the letters of this paper, there are changes. It begun from a simple desktop, and when I clicked the MSWord, MSWord appeared, so another change occurred. Then, there is a white thing in the monitor where I can put the words I want to express. Each time I press a letter or space or any key on my keyboard, there are corresponding actions that happen, and these actions are also the changes. So, this paper intends to present and to critic Empedocles’ and Anaxagoras’ phusis or the basic stuff and thoughts, and to give my idea as well.
Empedocles
Let’s begin with Empedocles. Empedocles is a citizen of Acragas or Agrigentum in Sicily, and he came from an aristocratic family. He opposed tyranny and refused the crown of his native town. He is not only a philosopher, but he is also a religious teacher and a magician. He claimed to be a healer of the sick, and even someone who recalled the dead to life. He was a believer of transmigration of the soul, and the manner of his death was a certain one. But there were stories that said that Empedocles jumped on the crater of Mt. Etna to prove his godliness.
            If the Thales believed that being is water, and for Heraclitus is fire, and for Anaximenes is air, for Empedocles, it is the four elements itself: earth, water, fire and air. Why these four? Because he thought that earth cannot become water, water cannot become fire, fire cannot become air, and air cannot become earth. So, for him, the four are unique. Not only unique, but, he also believed that the four kinds of matter are unchangeable and they are the ultimate particles that create the concrete objects of the world by their cooperation with each other.
            For Empedocles, however, the four elements never change; they remain always the same, and it is through their different combinations that other beings are brought into existence, which means that they the four elements are capable only of two things: uniting and separating itself from other elements. (Yarza, 1994) But the question is how can they unite and separate with each other? The elements are combined through love and separated through hatred or discord. (Gaarder, 1995) Now we know that there are processes involved between the four elements: the separation or discord, and the uniting or love. Love and Hate are material and physical forces that attracts and separate the elements or particles, respectively. Of course, there is always an imbalance because the two forces can never go at the same time. So Empedocles identified four stages: (Stumpf, 2008, p. 19-20)
I.              Love is present and Hate is totally absent
II.            Hate starts to invade things but there is still more love present
III.           Hate predominate and particles begin to separate
IV.          Hate is present
Then, the elements are now ready again to begin a new cycle.
Anaxagoras
            Anaxagoras was born in Clazomenae, near Miletus, around the year 500 B.C. He was perhaps the first one to transfer the center of philosophy to Athens, for he remained in that city teaching for thirty years, until a charge of impiety forced him to transfer to Lampsacus, where he died around the year 428.
For Anaxagoras, nature is built up of infinite number of minute particles which are invisible to the naked eye (Sophie’s World, 1995, p.33) and this was the “seed” or the homeomeries, which Aristotle defined as the things that remain quantitatively the same even if they are divided into smaller and smaller parts. (Yarza, 1994) Anaxagoras believed that the four qualitatively unchanged elements cannot account for the infinite variety and differentiation of the world of experience. He therefore held that there is “a portion of everything in everything”. Everything must come from something that already exists. (Yarza, 1994, p. 51)
            In the beginning, according to Anaxagoras, the universe was an infinite mass containing the homeomeries of all things. The power or force that is responsible for the forming of things out of the first mass is the Nous or Mind or Intelligence. Mind is mixed with nothing, but is alone, itself by itself.(Stumpf, 2008, p. 21-22)
Change exists or not?
            For Empedocles and Anaxagoras, they said that their phusis never change or unchangeable. But the question is “Is there something in this world that does not change?” Of course there is nothing because everything in this world changes. I have several examples to prove that everything really changes.
            The first one is in chemistry. For example, we have two elements H2 and O2. We have the number two subscripted to Hydrogen and Oxygen because the both of them are binary elements. If we bond the two, we can create water. But we all know that water has its chemical formula H20. The question is if the chemical equation is H2 + O2 => H2O, what happened to one of the elements? Now it is proven that we cannot have an unchangeable being.
            Next is human being. We know the saying that “people changes”. People change from a negative attitude to a positive attitude, or vice versa. By the term itself, a conversion, there is already a change in him. Another for human beings, they grow tall, they gain weight, and they increase in age, so everything changes.
            Next is in cooking. Before cooking, we buy the ingredients, prepare them, cut them and boil the meat to make it soft. Even in the boiling itself, the water temperature increases so there’s change. The meat from hard became soft, so there’s change. And even when we mix the ingredients together, the color changes, the smell changes, and the temperature changes. So, again, everything changes.
            Another example is our actions. As we know, action words are verbs, and we all know that verb has three tenses: the past tense, present tense and future tense. The past tells about the actions that already happened, the present tells about the actions that are continuously happening, and the future tense tells about the actions that are going to be done. When we say past to present and present to future, there is a transition of time and this transition means that there is a change or there are changes occurring. So everything changes.
            And for my last example, I would like to use the four stages presented by Empedocles. We know that each stage differ from each other, and we also know that there is a transition from the first stage up to the second, to the third, to the fourth, and back to the first. And again, by these transitions, we can say that, there is change.
            Therefore, change exists and it does not happen to nothing in this world.
Man
            For Empedocles, the four elements are his phusis, and for Anaxagoras is the mind. So I asked myself, can I think of a being that has the phusis of the two philosophers in one. What came to my mind is man. Man is composed of Empedocles’ phusis, the earth, fire, water and air, and of Anaxagoras, the mind. Where can we find the earth, fire, water and air in man? The earth is man’s flesh because God made man from a soil and He breathed it through His nostrils, and the breath is the air. Fire is man’s heat and water is one of man’s necessities to live. Man cannot live without his material aspect as well as his non-material aspect, his mind. Through the mind, man becomes different to other beings because through the mind, man becomes rational. So man cannot live without the two phusis.

Bibliography
Webster’s Universal Dictionary and Thesaurus
History of Ancient Philosophy by Ignatius Yarza
Introduction to Philosophy by Christine Carmela Ramos
Socrates to Sartre and Beyond by Samuel Enoch Stumpf and James Fieser
Sophie’s World by Jostein Gaarder

No comments:

Post a Comment